Nikon D3x DSLR
This is the full review of the most expensive DSLR ever. Don’t forget to see the full written review on ephotozine.com here: www.ephotozine.com … nikon d3x dslr digital camera review “full frame”
Comments
25 Responses to “Nikon D3x DSLR”Speak Your Mind
Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
The camera has a true range which is the ISO speeds regulated by the International Standards Organisation (ISO). It also has expandable settings that aren’t regulated by the Organisation so can’t be called (eg) ISO25,600, it has to be called (eg) Hi2. HTH.
what do you mean by “TRUE” iso
@likeawhispr lol. . . it doesn’t say that and you know it.
4:12. . . . now the “shitta” is made of kevlar carbon fibre
@CrazyJimKU It’s a brand new camera that wasn’t released when I did this video. I’m good, but not that good. . . =;O)
What about the Leica M9!!?!?
I was referring to the primeval part of a man that needs something rugged and big to feel more manly. Car enthusiasts enjoy big cars or louder engines. But I guess it’s the lovely smooth drive that makes you feel like a man. Y
ou get a lovely detailed image of a pink rabbit wearing a tutu and a ribbon and you’ll feel like a man? lol, go away if you have nothing useful to contribute.
Good point, but Nikon told me at the press launch that it was an exclusive sensor. =:O)
I believe that this has to have the same sensor as the Sony A900. I mean, let’s face it, the D3x came out not long after the A900. A manufacturer would not reinvent the wheel when the sensor was already available from Sony. The lower noise than Sony A900 can be attributed to different processing of the image. Maybe Nikon uses more intensive noise reduction, in which case, I’d prefer to see the noise. I am in favor of less processing. If I want to process image, let me do that in post
Lol xD nice sarcasm
you “felt like a man holding it”?? lol. . . I guess for some photographers it is the camera and not the quality of the images they produce. . . .
Guess I better cancel my D90 . . .
Theoretically, the Hassy isn’t a DSLR. It doesn’t have a prism and is classed as medium format.
Other cameras with interchangeable lenses that don’t have prisms have been left out of the DSLR name such as the Olympus E-P1 and Panny G1/GH1. =:O)
“This is the full review of the most expensive DSLR ever. ”
Try a Hasselblad H3D.
How is 100 to 1600 true ISO vs. 50 or higher then 1600 when ISO on a Digital system is only the gain for the amp that relays the signal ?
Also, it is the lens and the shot that should make you feel like a man, not the body.
The D3X is a camera for it’s “own” kind of people. It’s not aimed at those who use or need the D3 which is more like a sport / reportage camera.
D3X is more of a studio or landscape camera where you most often use tripods and don’t need the higher ISOs. Nikon didn’t release the D3X just to get everybody to think “hey, it’s got like 12 more megapixels, I have to buy it”, since it’s aimed at professional photographers who knows what they’re buying.
D3 max speed is 11fps. - in DX
if i had to choose between this camera and the d3 or d700, i could have to choose those 2 over the d3x. i would make this choice because i know that i would be getting an excellent quality camera regardless and could pocket that left over money towards getting a great lens to go along with it. don’t get trapped in the megapixel wars everybody! you can resize an image to fit numerous dimensions in programs such as Lightroom.
The most expensive and also out dated.
PENIS ENLARGER
and what about the black dot issue of 5DMii?
I think if I bought a 250k lambo and it had 4WD but couldn’t go off road then yes I’d complain. The D3x has the ability to go to ISO6400 but is rubbish compared to a camera half it’s price.
The D3X isnt a hi ISO camera For its intended purpose, it performs magnificantly Its like whining about paying 250K for a Lambo and complaining of its off road performance. Use it in a studio or shoot landscapes. Then if you have complaints, ok Nikon has a hi ISO camera they needed a hi MP studio/landscape camera an entry level, portable, med format camera They hit the bulls eye. I ask that you judge it on its intended purpose.
You’re missing the point. Are you suggesting that you’re willing to pay that amount for a camera and it give inferior results to a camera less than half its price? If I was to invest in a D3x, I’d want it to perform excellently at all speeds.
I think youd be hard pressed to find anyone that owns this camera using it at 6400. Not much need for that in a studio or landscape photography. Therefore, your main criticism of this camera is irrelevant. If youre evaluating quality at those ISOs, use the camera whos intention was to perform at those levels, the D3. Why not delve into IQ or DR instead?
Completely, well almost completely, wrong of you to compare the Sony or the Canon to the D3x. Not even CLOSE to being in the same field or image quality performance.
Comparing these models simply because of MP rating is ludicrous. Why don’t you compare apples to apples? The only true competitor in the market is the 1DsMIII, which is what the D3x was up against.
Do some true color, noise, IQ, body construction, processing etc. and you will start to see the distance become much greater.